Last week, comedian Jon Stewart of The Daily Show announced his upcoming “Rally to Restore Sanity” in Washington DC. Using 9/11 truth as an example of the “insanity” that plagues this country, Stewart mocked the cause as “right-wing kookiness.”
(NOTE: When those in the 9/11 Truth Movement years ago implicated Bush & Co. for being behind the 9/11 Attacks, they where “mocked” as “Left-winged Conspiracy Kooks.” Now since the “Left” is “in Power,” the paradigm is reversed by labeling those who believe in a “9/11 Conspiracy” as “Right-winged Conspiracy Kooks.”
This 180 degree shift was done to keep the “Puppet Masters” hidden behind the scenes with their “Punch & Judy Show” of “Right vs. Left” when it’s really about “Them” (the Globalists) against “We the People.” Keep your eye on the ball, it’s the “Totalitarian New World Order” that is the “Grand Conspiracy.”)
There is something distinctly distasteful about making jokes about mass murder and destruction when they are happening in the here and now, which is what Stewart and Colbert do on a nightly basis. Defenders will argue that if we don’t laugh we cry; it’s a form of catharsis.
Yet these programs also reassure us, subconsciously, that all is well in the world. And there are lines that they will not cross. When it comes to the interviews of *controversial* figures, ie politicians/mass murderers – 9 times out of 10 they throw softballs, giggle together, shake hands, and proceed with the commercials.
What is it about 9/11 and its unanswered questions that makes it so hard for mainstream journalists, media figures and even comedians to address it in an honest, straightforward manner? Is it because if it became common, verified knowledge that we were lied to about those attacks that changed the world and launched us into endless war, the establishment would be too threatened? Would too many comfortable jobs would be lost?
Is this all about cowardice and greed?
After nine years of solid, stonewall resistance to dealing with reality and an unending onslaught of mindless mockery and derision, it’s easy to think that might just be a big part of it.
And then of course Stewart’s ambushing of Rod Blagojevich which I thought was a pretty odd position for a “progressive” to take after he practically gave back rubs and “happy endings” to each and every neocon that has come on his set to pimp their new books or try to rebrand themselves as anything but the war criminals they are. That list includes but is not limited to Bill Kristol, Ari Fleischer, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, Thomas Friedman, Tom Ridge, and John Yoo. Each and every one of the previously named neocons and or war criminals, Jon Stewart treated with more respect than he did Rod Blagojevich who’s only crime was to threaten Bank of America if they didn’t live up to the conditions of the banker bailout bill.
Recently these two progressive shills (Stewart & Colbert) have each taken on a new directive which certainly lives up to their pathetic performances in the past.
What is surprising is that Stewart chastised the radical left for holding such beliefs as “George Bush is a war criminal.”
Ccertain actions from the Bush Administration merit extreme condemnation (like impeachment and imprisonment) and to that list I would like to toss out 1. lying 935 times to justify an illegal war which has killed over a million Iraqi people and dislocated about 4 million others, 2. creating false documents (Niger Yellow Cake) like the neocons at the Office of Special Plans did to justify an illegal war, 3. torture, 4. rendition, 5. secret prisons, 6. CIA backed mercenary death squads 7. depleted uranium spread across Iraq …
I mean, if these actions don’t merit calling George W. Bush (and several of Jon Stewart’s recent guests) a war criminal, what does? Is turning a blind eye to such atrocities and war crimes really “sanity” or is it something else?
It’s clear that Stewart is doing his part to help the globalist regime in charge whitewash the past 10 years. He’s actually helping to rewrite our collective history on these matters and turn “moderate” progressives, those with their heads buried in the sand, against those “fringe” elements who tried to demand justice and accountability from the previous administration. If anything proves Jon Stewart’s complicity in the globalist criminal actions, this is certainly it.
Jon Stewart’s Advice To Rick Sanchez
Jon Stewart responded to Rick Sanchez being fired from CNN News for stating that Jews run the media by saying, “All he has to do is apologize to us, and we’ll hire him back.”
Question: What does Rick Sanchez have to “apologize” for? All he did was tell it like it is and just stated a fact. It’s no secret that most of the top positions in the media are Jewish people (do a websearch if you don’t know this to be true).
Even Stewart admitted it by asking Sanchez to “apologize to us.” “Us” meaning the powerful Jewish club who controls the media.
The Mystery Behind Jon Stewart’s Name Change
When the news show “60 Minutes” asked Jon Steward why he changed his Jewish last name from “Leibowitz” to Stewart, Stewart explained: “Sounded too Hollywood” (June 2001)
I want you to change your name. Back to Leibowitz. Stewart is just so 20th-century, a relic of that dark age when Jews in show biz changed their names because they feared “real Americans” wouldn’t accept the originals.
And, on a more serious note, it would represent the end of a shabby, antiquated era, pronouncing that aspect of anti-Semitism now (hopefully) dead and gone. It might even make it easier for young comedians, actors, and rock stars to resist the temptation to try to “pass.”