The accusations against Hillary and the Clinton Foundation as well, are so numerous that their lack of legal impact is surely some kind of sorcery – or spirit cookery.
I’m not alone in being mystified. Rudy Giuliani – an especially obnoxious politician but a former US federal prosecutor – was recently on CNBC voicing the same opinion. “I’ve never seen a case with as much evidence as the one against Clinton,” he said.
“The two main elements to prove intent is destroying evidence — well, she destroyed 33,000 emails — and what we call false exculpatory statements. You’ve got at least 12 lies,” the former New York mayor said on “Squawk Box.” “How about ‘I had only 1 cellphone?’ She had 13 cellphones, and they’ve all disappeared. How could 13 cellphones disappear unless you destroyed them?” …
“I’ve prosecuted a lot of cases. I’ve never seen one with more evidence against Hillary and her whole band of co-conspirators. I see it as a racketeering case,” he said.
Even if Trump is the winner, aside from the point that even if he wanted to and knew how to, “fix” the US, it’s impossible to fix an inherently flawed system of governance which uses communist style central banking as a mechanism to steal from its people. It cannot be fixed in any meaningful way without completely shutting down the Federal Reserve and renouncing the national debt just for starters.
And, if that were done it would have massive repercussions for the markets that no one could possibly predict and a market crash of biblical proportions would likely follow.